Project Governance is a management framework which allows
leadership visibility and decisioning authority within the project structure.
It aids management in tracking and managing multiple projects and programs
simultaneously, aligning project teams to a set of standards and mitigating
risk. Governance processes can range widely from organization to organization.
It can be as simple as a weekly status report and as complex as a system of
multiple, inter-related templates, on-line program tools and a series of
project management process assessments and tollgates.
More robust governance can create tremendous value to
leadership, but this value can come at a cost to project teams. Added
deliverables and additional documentation and meetings could potentially cause
roadblocks and timing delays if the project manager is not prepared. To be
successful in this type of environment, a PM needs to understand their organization’s
governance process and plan ahead for the steps and actions required to move
beyond the next tollgate.
1.
Understand the requirements: In a high governance
environment, it isn’t enough to know what documents the governance committee
wants to see, PMs need to know why. What specific elements or key points are
they asking the team to satisfy? Is it a question of budget? Scope? Resources?
Timeline? It may be different depending on the tollgate, but knowing the
drivers to each conversation will help the team prepare the appropriate
information.
2.
Get in front of it: Plan ahead in your project routines
and include your governance activities early in the effort. Governance activity
usually requires a good bit of project work to be done before it can be
completed, but oftentimes much of the progress on the governance deliverables
themselves can be made up front. There are typically templates to fill out and
systems to log project information. Knowing that completing the governance templates
are a requirement to getting through the tollgate, the best approach is to
start early and ensure that you have time to deal with what would be an
avoidable delay.
3.
Put the Governance SME’s to work: Most organizations
with heavy governance processes typically have an SME that can guide you
through the process. It may be part of someone’s job description, like a PMO
analyst or manager, or it may just be a seasoned Project/Program Manager that’s
familiar with the process and knows how to best navigate. Either way, find that
person and ask for help. Most often, it’s uncertainty in how to get through the
process, not the project information itself which is lacking.
4.
Leverage your champion: A best practice in project
management is a project champion – a high ranking manager in the organization
that has ultimate accountability for the project’s success. The project
champion may sit on the governance committee, or may simply attend to represent
the project. Request that your champion communicate with their peers on the
governance committee in advance of the meeting. Find out what is being asked
for, any specific leadership concerns, what leaders may need additional
information before approving the project. The champion’s role is critical to
pushing projects through multiple layers of governance in a complex process.
5.
Communicate ahead of time: Keep the project team, key
stakeholders and management informed on upcoming governance activities and requirements.
Communicate expectations to team resources as early as it makes sense to do so,
and clearly as possible. If the team lacks clarity on what is being requested, why
and when its needed, chances are that they will focus on other priority items
until they understand how to fulfill the deliverable.
6.
Shield project team when possible: Project teams rarely
have full visibility to project governance deliverables. It can be perceived as
something that is a PM’s responsibility, or gets in the way of their regular
work. As a PM, understanding this perception and working to minimize as much of
the administrative governance as possible from the team will help project
members maintain focus on the most critical tasks and make a vigorous process
seem less burdensome.
7.
Project Governance is not Project Discipline: Many PMs
fall into the trap of thinking that, if all the deliverables are completed, the
project is in good shape. Governance processes may require that a team
identifies risks, documents a resource plan, provides budget estimates, etc.
but do not always audit the quality. If the team is simply filing out the
document to satisfy the process rather than drilling into the issue, the
exercise is wasted. Haphazardly documentation to check that deliverable off the
“to-do” list creates confusion and additional risk. Be wary of short-cuts and
work to identify, confirm and communicate where value is and is not being
added.
Leadership implements project governance because it is an
invaluable tool in maintaining control over project functions. Although
managing projects effectively in these types of environments can require more
administrative effort from PMs, with proper planning, effective use of SME
resources and a focus on disciplined project management, both project teams and
leadership can recognize the benefits of strong governance without undue
stress.